RSS RSS

 

  • Links

  • Categories

  • Meta

  • Archives

  • SHOW/HIDE NAVIGATION
    Feb
    26

    Wow….the other day, I had a prospective client tell me that the people he was looking for were not online.  It has been many years since I have heard this. 

    Back in 2006 when Steve Wynn was opening up Wynn Las Vegas, HR Executive Magazine was fortunate enough to interview Arte Nathan.  When posed a similar question, his response was on the money:

    “I now know who’s online, and who’s not online,” Nathan says. “The answer is, everybody is online. People in the lower economic strata — all of their children have computers. It’s how they’ve guaranteed that their kids will get a better education and better access to all the information that’s out there.”

    Now this employer was looking to fill call center jobs in Las Vegas.  I would venture to say that ‘those job seekers are online’ as is the rest of the population ….. like my 90 year-old grandmother, my parents, aunts, uncles, nephews, nieces and everyone in between all of these age groups.

    Come to think of it…. I do not know of anyone who is not online anymore.  Can you?

    Feb
    25

    Las Vegas (NV) – The data presented in this press release were collected by Recruiting Nevada (“RN”) during the 4th quarter of 2008 from job seekers who visited the www.recruitingnevada.com website. Recruiting Nevada publishes Nevada’s largest network of employment Web sites, thus attracting the largest audience of local and relocating job seekers. Restrepo Consulting Group LLC (“RCG”) analyzed the trends that the data reflect.

    The two firms work together to analyze and report on employment trends in Southern Nevada. The work that RN performs is critical to understanding the types of jobs being marketed, the job seekers that are interested in those jobs and our community, what job skills they might be bringing and where they are coming from. RCG’s role is to assess and interpret what the data means for the future economic sustainability of Southern Nevada.

    A total of 2,729 responses were collected by RN during the period. The data contained herein represent self-reported information. Job seekers’ intentions might vary significantly from their actual behavior. The data being analyzed are based on responses to job openings that have been marketed by RN for its clients, not basic inquiries.

    Top 10 States: Where Job Seekers Are From: 1,832 of 2,729 Respondents

    Analysis

    • There were 2,729 survey job seekers during the 4th quarter of 2008 vs 2,857 during Q3. 67% or 1,832 of Q4 respondents came from 10 states. Nevada (28.5%), California (11.2 %) and Texas (4.5 %) were the Top 3 states for survey job seekers during the quarter. In Q3, the Top 3 states were Nevada, California and Florida. Florida, which was #3 in Q3, dropped to the #5 spot in Q4. In Q3, Nevada respondents represented 26.3% of all respondents, whereas 13.7% of respondents came from California and 5.4% from Florida.
    • Over 72% of all the respondents from the Top 10 states were from Southwestern states (Nevada, California, Texas and Arizona), compared to slightly over 70% last quarter. Three of these states, Nevada, California and Arizona, remain at the center of the housing market collapse. Of particular concern is Nevada, because the data is indicative of the weak job market. Nevada reached an unemployment rate of 9.1% in December 2008, almost a full percentage point above the national average of 7.2% in December 2008.

     

    Top 5 Employment Categories of Interest to Job Seekers

    Analysis

    • The Top 5 employment categories most heavily marketed, and the ones that job seekers were most interested in included:
      1. Nursing – 32% vs. 41% in Q3
      2. Construction Management – 22% vs. 18% in Q3
      3. Mining Trade – 24% vs. 18% in Q3
      4. Construction Trades – 14% vs. 13% in Q3 and
      5. Instruction – 8% vs. 10% in Q3
    • Again, the good news is that the largest segment of job seekers was looking for nursing jobs, a profession that is in very short supply in Nevada. The bad news is that 46% of the job seekers were from the Construction sector, a jump of 48% from Q3’s estimate. This a very clear indicator of the massive job losses experienced by this sector nationally. That construction workers are seeking jobs in Nevada shows how bad things are elsewhere, considering the state of our own real estate market!
    • Please note that RN is able to define the audience of readers/users by its Search Engine Marketing (SEM). So, the data on employment categories skew towards nursing, because that is where the largest portion of RN’s marketing budget is invested. No dollars, however, were spent marketing construction-related jobs. These are “active” jobseekers who found the www.recruitingnevada.com website.

     

    Job Seeker Education Levels

    Analysis

    • The data appear to indicate that there was a relatively good supply of well-educated job seekers looking for work in Nevada during Q4, 2008. Added together, job seekers with Bachelors, Master and PhD. degrees comprised 29.4% (vs. 35% in Q3) of the persons looking for new employment, in-state and out-of-state. What we don’t know is how many are currently employed, underemployed or unemployed.
    • Almost 28 (vs. 23% in Q3) of respondents had a high school diploma. About 16% had an Associate’s degree and 9.4% had a trade school diploma

    Job Seeker Experience

     

    Analysis

    • Senior level and senior management employees, again, represented the largest share of job seekers at 43.2%. This was the same portion as in Q3. Mid level employees and mid level management accounted for 18.4%, the second largest group. In Q3, mid level respondents accounted for 19.6% of job seekers.
    • On a positive note, its good for Nevada that mid and senior level employees are interested in possibly relocating to the state. On the down side, the relatively large percentage of senior and mid level job seekers is the result of the continued shedding of jobs around the country, because of a recession that is becoming more severe with each passing month.

    When Will Job Seekers Move?

    Analysis

    • When asked about their interest level, 54% (53% – Q3) of all the job seekers in Q4 said that they would move to Nevada if they could find a job here. Clearly, most respondents do not want to move to Nevada without a job already in hand, because of the severity of the economy in the state.
    • Nearly 23% of job seekers indicated that they currently live in Nevada. The share in Q3 was 22%.

     

    Job Seekers & Their Housing Needs

     

    Analysis

    • The majority of respondents in the Q4 survey, not currently living in Nevada (49%, vs. 45% in Q3), indicated that they would prefer to rent if they move to Nevada, at least initially. Additionally, 39% (Q3  – 43%) said that they would rent first and then buy a home once they move to Nevada. Only 12% claimed that they would like to buy a house upon relocating to the state. This was consistent with Q3’s numbers.
    • The weak economy is clearly causing job seekers to be very conservative in making long-term and large-scale financial commitments like home purchases. This also continues to be function of the health of the housing markets in Nevada and in the job seekers’ state of origin.
    • Out of those job seekers who expressed an interest in buying a house once they move to Nevada, 52% (51% in Q3) were senior level or senior management employees with over 4 years of experience.

    Job Seekers Education Level & Willingness To Buy a Home In Nevada

    Analysis

    • The data show that, regardless of the education level, more than half of all job seekers plan to ultimately buy a home (51% – blue and yellow bars).
    • Of the respondents who stated that they intended to buy a home in Nevada, over 29% (Q3 – 26%) had a bachelor’s degree. Of those who plan to rent, almost 31% (Q3 – 24%) had a high school diploma.
    Feb
    18

    Change is here, and more may be coming. To prepare employers for these far-reaching changes, attorneys from the national labor and employment law firm, Fisher & Phillips LLP, are offering a breakfast briefing with the primary focus being the new FMLA Regulations, changes to the ADA and anticipated changes to federal labor laws.

    Thursday, March 5, 2009
    7:30 – 8:00 a.m. – Registration and Continental Breakfast
    8:00 – 11:30 a.m. – Program

    Tuscany Suites & Casino
    255 Flamingo Road
    Las Vegas, NV 89169 
      Registration Fee: $45 per person
    $35 per person for two or more 

    RSVP to: ihasforth[at]laborlawyers.com

    Feb
    13

    This is a reprint from In Business Las Vegas last week (and well worth sharing):

    By Nicole Lucht / Staff Writer 

    Zappos, Trump Tower, MGM Mirage, Ford Motor Credit, Sunrise Hospital, Las Vegas Sands. Layoffs are hitting all sectors of the local economy.

    On a national level, retailers Macy’s and Home Depot are cutting 7,000 jobs each, pharmaceutical giant Pfizer and wireless provider Sprint are cutting 8,000 each, Microsoft is cutting 5,000, Intel is cutting 6,000 and United Airlines is cutting another 1,000 on top of the 1,500 positions eliminated last year.

    In December, Nevada’s unemployment rate hit 9.1 percent, an unprecedented full percentage point increase from the previous month. The national rate is 7.2 percent.

    And the news becomes more dire: State economists are expecting 39,300 jobs will be lost this year, compared with 24,600 in 2008.

    Granted, there will be some mass hirings, such as CityCenter’s recent announcement it is accepting applications for 12,000 positions. But those aren’t expected to outweigh the job losses this year and next.

    CityCenter was expecting 150,000 job applications, and even a small employer such as In-N-Out, which had 50 open positions for its newest Las Vegas store, had about 1,000 people apply, reported the Las Vegas Sun, a sister publication of In Business Las Vegas.

    As the recession deepens, employers don’t want to cut their workers, most of whom are loyal employees, so they are considering creative ways of keeping costs down to minimizing layoffs, local workforce experts said.

    “Employers are doing a lot of things: They’re not hiring people, they’re not replacing people who quit, they’re letting people go, they’re cutting salaries, they’re reducing work hours … they’re cutting back expenses,” said John Restrepo, principal of Restrepo Consulting.

    “Everyone’s cutting back to adjust their cost structure down to the reality of the revenues they can expect to see over the next couple of years.”

    Although employers may worry about how their workers will react to cuts, employees may actually be relieved to find their hours or benefits have been cut rather than finding themselves filling out an unemployment claim.

    “I think (employers) initial concern is how the employees will react,” said Joan Burge, chief executive of Office Dynamics, a Las Vegas-based workplace training company that consults large and small companies nationwide. “Will they lose good people?”

    But when employers make changes – be it across-the-board salary cuts or fewer work hours – they are receiving a more positive reaction from employees than they anticipated, she said.

    Employees may be more willing to accept a pay cut or reduction in hours if it means their colleagues will be spared the ax, she said.

    There’s optimism that President Barack Obama will give the economy a fresh start, but at the same time, Congress continues to wrangle with the details of a promised economic stimulus package.

    “We’ve got to get to bare bottom … and work our way up,” Burge said. “People are saying, ‘We’re sick of where things are.’ They want to contribute. They want to be part of the catalyst of change.”

    The second economic stimulus package, a $800 billion-plus program, probably won’t be felt on the local level for a couple of years, Restrepo said. “The immensity of the problem is so large that no one really knows right now what it’s going to take to turn things around sufficiently so that we see a sustained recovery,” he said.

    Until the economy recovers, shifting costs to the employee, such as cutting benefits, dropping 401(k) contribution matches and changing eligibility for benefits are being considered more frequently by businesses, said Tanna Prince, Nevada market vice president for Lockton, a company specializing in insurance, risk management and employee benefits. The company has about 25 clients in Nevada and several hundred nationwide.

    “Things are evolving all the time,” she said. “We’re seeing the gamut of what you would expect.”

    She said she has noticed a gradual drop-off in the number of employees at companies that Lockton serves, as the overall insured population is reduced.

    Although employers make changes to benefits every year, Prince said, “it has been particularly poignant with the economy so bad.”

    Employers, she said, “are looking at every possible strategy to keep programs, but also to afford them.”

    “I’ve just never seen it this bad,” in terms of if employers can keep their plans afloat, she said.

    Prince talked about the continuously rising health care costs – some at 10 percent annually – that employers struggle to keep up with. Some employers are cutting back on insurance just to maintain a flat cost for the new year.

    And many employers are cutting benefits midyear, an unusual move in prosperous times.

    But eventually, if an employer continues to make cuts every year, there won’t be anything left.

    Employers who have the budgetary ability to make long-term strategic shifts in their benefits, such as adding wellness and health risk management programs, may find an improvement in their costs a few years later as healthier employees’ demands for health care go down.

    And for the short term, Prince is finding businesses implementing stricter eligibility requirements for new employees, for instance, requiring employees to waive benefits for a husband or wife who has a job that also offers benefits.

    Also, she said companies are conducting dependent audits to weed out any people that aren’t legally their employees’ dependents, further saving costs.

    And those employees who gripe about cuts or stand around the office water cooler all day complaining? They should be the first to go, Burge said.

    “They are dead weight.”

    When laying off people, employers will have to reassign responsibilities, to pick up the slack left by those cut from the workforce, she said.

    “A lot of (employers) feel bad,” Burge said. “They don’t want to do this, but it’s one of the decisions that has to be made as a business owner.”

    To make up for employees’ sacrifices, Burge suggested that when a strong economy returns, reward those workers with a bonus or a creative token of appreciation.

    When Burge was an employee, she lost two jobs because of downsizing.

    “There are no guarantees ever – even in good times,” she said.

    One of the Las Vegas companies that Burge advises is considering cutting its workdays to four days a week, effectively cutting employees’ hours from 40 hours a week to 32.

    The big corporations that Burge advises are still considering layoffs, she said.

    “It’s not over yet,” she said. “There’s still more coming.”

    Nicole Lucht covers health care, workplace and banking issues for In Business Las Vegas and its sister publication, the Las Vegas Sun. She can be reached at 2598832 or at nicole.lucht@lasvegassun.com.

    Feb
    12

    We all see the impact the economy is having on education (especially higher education).   As budgets get cut, classes either get cancelled or the student to teacher ratios increase.  Either way, this has a long term impact on Nevada.   Our ‘education engine’ is stalling. 

    It is widely known that when unemployment levels rise, those out of work typically look to improve their skills.  They either update their current skill set, or pick up a new set.  Both the job seeker and the employer benefit from this when the economy turns around.

    Strategically - Nevada should be investing in education during this time period.  It would be a great opportunity to improve the overall education level of the entire population.  The problem is we are not. 

    It is about time we start valuing education

    Feb
    12

    Las Vegas NIEOn Sunday I came across an ad in the Las Vegas Review Journal for Las Vegas Newspapers in Education (NIE).  I have been aware of the program for years, but never really took the time to understand ‘how’ it works.  Basically, there is an opportunity for a business to sponsor the program by purchasing newspaper subscriptions for children in the Clark County School District.

    My first thought was ….I am not certain kids read newspapers anymore.  Most consume their media online where they get access to more relevant news in a more timely manner. 

    Then my mind soon ventured to ….. why the Review Journal is still supporting this (and why they would dedicate valuable ad space) in a down economy. 

    Then the answer hit me….. to try and save some circulation.  Perhaps NIE is nothing more than a fictitious way to keep newspaper subscriptions overinflated because they are ‘paid’ for by a contribution (1) Get a business to buy subscriptions in the name of supporting education (2) count those as fully paid subscriptions in future circulation audits (3) Attempt to justify ridiculous ad rates based on circulation. 

    The amounts solicited by NIE range from $62.50 to $1,000.  With the cost of computers coming down so much, would it not make more sense to buy the same child a laptop for $400 and just show him or her how to consume their media online?  It would be a one-time investment rather than an ongoing expense. 

    Or how about a Kindle that would allow the child to download books at little charge.  Both of these media distribution systems would last years and years and not have to be renewed. 

    Just a crazy thought…..  Thought I would share.   

    Feb
    10

    Weddle Launches New Blog

    Posted In: Best Practices by doug

    Peter WeddleI have been publishing Peter Weddle’s articles in this blog for a few years now.  Peter is one of the most respected authors in the industry and someone that I have known for many years.  He has authored or edited over two dozen books and has been a columnist for The National Business Employment Weekly, CNN.com, The Wall Street Journal and four private newsletters that are distributed worldwide.

    Well, Peter recently launched a new blog titled WorkStrong.  I strongly encourage you to add it to your Blog Reader, iGoogle, RSS Feed or whatever technology you use to monitor websites of interest. 

     

     

    Feb
    6

    LivinginLVA friend of mine publishes a podcast and blog on Living in Las Vegas.  He recently asked me to be a guest blogger on the website, blogging on employment in Las Vegas.  This is my first blogging effort written specifically towards the job-seeker.  I hope to find enough time to blog at least once per week.  Here is my last blog on the Las Vegas Job Market Getting Tougher for Job-seekers.

    This opportunity has me thinking about creating a forum (of some sort) on RecruitingNevada.com and our network of employment websites.  There are some challenges creating a forum, especially managing the strings (or conversations) themselves.  We may offer an opportunity to our clients to moderate and contribute as well, giving them the opportunity to communicate directly with job-seekers if they choose. 

    I’m still not sure and I would love to hear your opinions.  Please feel free to email me:  Doug[at]RecruitingNevada.com. 

    Feb
    5

    The SHRM LINE Employment Expectations Report comes out once a month.  The headlines of this month’s report speak volumes:

    • February hiring expectations are at four-year lows for the month
    • Recruiting difficulty was virtually nonexistent in January
    • Compensation growth is sluggish for new hires

    You can read the entire report here.

    SHRM LINE Report

    About SHRM LINE:
    The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) Leading Indicators of National Employment® or LINE® Report is based on a monthly survey of over 1000 HR professionals in the U.S. manufacturing and service sectors. It reports on monthly changes in employment expectations, recruiting difficulty and new-hire compensation.

    Feb
    4

    January 2009 Economic INsight

    Posted In: Job Losses by doug

    As usual, John Restrepo does an awesome job of explaining the current employment situation with a single image:

    This graph compares job gains/losses between December 2008 and 2009.  As you will see, over 15,500 jobs in Nevada have been lost.

    You can read the entire January 2009 Economic INsight here. 

    « Previous Entries